![](https://assets10.geni.com/images/external/x_com_black_16.png?1720210390)
![](https://assets10.geni.com/images/facebook_white_small_short.gif?1720210390)
@Crowned HIM...
Roger de Montalt
Regarding this tree, looking through the revisions, I have NEVER touched that profile which has been around since 2008.
You'll see my name throughout many family trees. I've built numerous trees for celebrities, friends, family of family, and random people I come across in books or television who aren't necessarily "known" people. I have added over 24,000 profiles "by hand" in Geni.com from North America, South America, Europe, Asia and Polynesian Islands. As a matter of fact, it seems you follow LOTS of profiles I created and/or co-manage, so of course you'll see my name all over the place.
Right, K , 'm not accusing you, I said YOUR name is the one that keeps popping up. Here is another Example, I am descent of all 7 Beaumont and all 7 Warren children of isabelle Vermandois Elisabeth de Vermandois, dame de Crépy
now she only has 9 kids and says i am descent of 2 - Why are the people and pathways going missing?
Some descendants: Lawrence and Sarah Wills, they had John (1813), James Hersey (1815), George (1817) and Henry Lawrence (1818) It is possible that this Lawrence Wills later joined the coast guard and died in 1829 on the Isle of Wight. http://www.worldfamilies.net/surnames/wills/pats
Hi again Corey. I checked out Elisabeth de Vermandois, dame de Crépy and she appears to have all her 14 children plus a few ... So K or Jason may have done some merging last night.
Another option to look for when relationships seem to go missing is to see if someone has hidden them. It's a misuse of Geni features based on misunderstanding how things work, but on profile view if you scroll down to Immediate Family at the bottom of the page and click Edit, you may see some names in the Hidden column. Names should never be hidden for historic profiles, but sometimes people do itthinking they are detaching profiles, perhaps. If you see anyone hidden please unhide them, and then they can be dealt with appropriately.
Another possibililty, of course, is that someone has in fact detached a spouse or child. In this case, I always look at the revisions history to see who and what has been done, and i look at the About Me to see if a note has been added to explain. If you feel the relationship has been detached in error, locate the missing person and reattach as well as contacting the curator of the profile.
Hope this helps. I'll be on the road for the rest of today, but please send me a private message if there are any of my curated profiles you have questions about. I've been traveling for the past month and my Anglo Norman profiles are in need of tending, so please alert me where you see problems. Thanks!
Private - I think you may be correct.
I had an interesting experience yesterday. I found a few merges in my Resolve Data Conflict area that had the name of another curator on it. I resolved the first one because I trust this curator's work, but then I went and looked more carefully and thought that the merge may have been a bad one. So I contacted them. They said that they did not do that merge. I found two more merges with their names on them and they replied that they didn't do those either.
This tells me that (1) we should be careful in reviewing tree conflicts (pending merges) and in resolving data conflicts because we can't assume that the person whose name is on it as the Updated By is actually the person who suggested/initiated the merge and (2) we should not "blame" someone in discussions because their name is found on a merge, given whatever is causing this phenomenon.
Thanks Pam, ya i found the problem there with Isabel Elizabeth de Vermandois, Countess and merged it. It is back to normal again, There was a disconnect, and have been going back through and re-requesting all the disconnected merges. It is a phenomenon so I am taking a break and will get back to it after summer.