The Peerage has a different father connected, with citations:
Cynric, King of Wessex was born circa 495.2 He was the son of Cerdic, King of Wessex.1 He died circa 560.1
He succeeded as the King Cynric of Wessex in 534.1
Children of Cynric, King of Wessex
Ceawlin, King of Wessex+1 b. c 535, d. 593
Cutha, King of Wessex+ b. c 540, d. 584
Citations
[S38] John Morby, Dynasties of the World: a chronological and genealogical handbook (Oxford, Oxfordshire, U.K.: Oxford University Press, 1989), page 66. Hereinafter cited as Dynasties of the World.
[S2299] John Warburg, "re: Kings of Scotland," e-mail message to Darryl Roger Lundy, 28 May 2007. Hereinafter cited as "re: Kings of Scotland."
http://www.thepeerage.com/p10264.htm#i102634
So what I'm seeing here on Geni is that the man on The Peerage site is connected here as Cynric's grandfather instead of his father. The Peerage has Crioda who is connected as his father showing as his brother, both being sons of Cerdic.
The Peerage has different dates for Cynric:
Children of Cerdic, King of Wessex
Creoda (?)4 b. c 493, d. 534
Cynric, King of Wessex+1 b. c 495, d. c 560
whereas Geni has Cynric born 525.
Notes in Cynric's profile state:
"Whether or not Creola was father of Cynric is not certain. The Winchester Manuscript of the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle lists Cynric as the son of Cerdic. However the Abingdon and Worcester Manuscripts have Creola as the son of Cerdic and father of Cynric"
So, all that said, which way seems to be the best documented for these connections? I'm leaning with the notes in the profile being bolstered by the info on The Peerage stie.
Any feedback, etc. appreciated. Thanks.