![](https://www.geni.com/images/external/twitter_bird_small.gif?1647359868)
![](https://www.geni.com/images/facebook_white_small_short.gif?1647359868)
Date of birth was locked on "about.975" following wiki ENG & Medlands.
Today unlocked and changed to about.969 by Carl Gustav Verbraeken (then re-locked field again.. so it should be a certainty..)
Nothing terribly disastrous, but there have already been errors solved here, & now I don't see new notes, or more authoritative sources.. so I can only ask:
-are you still following https://www.genealogieonline.nl/families-klein-ree-ea/I43887.php again? [and therefore using the "elastic technique" to match dates?]
(because their cited marriage is 985? if so, look good there is the +/- symbol which should really stand for "about" ..Instead ML says just "991 or after" )
Hi Livio,
Nothing special, but you have to know that we cannot allow impossible relationships.e.g. when there are birth year gaps of several decades between siblings. If such a situation happens, it means that one of the siblings has to have been an uncle or aunt . With or or without sources, we know it remains a hypothesis, but an impossibility ‘with’ sources is far worse, it makes Geni unscientific and untrustworthy. I’d -really- kindly ask you. If you see such a thing and you cannot resolve it yourself, ask me and we can make a consensus to make other users agree. I hope we can make progress. Kind regards, CGV