Glen Stephen Poland if you feel anyone is behaving inappropriately in this thread please use the Report button underneath the timestamp which is immediately under their name next to the post you think would benefit from the review of Geni Staff.
Geni is not a faith based website, it is a collaborative genealogy website. Because it is collaborative people need to be able to support the information that they support with evidence otherwise we have anarchy. The evidence for Ragnar is stories told by people who may or may not have been descended from him but either way wrote the stories down hundreds of years later. Were they faithfully recording facts as they understood them, perhaps. Were they perhaps adding culturally specific moral lessons to the stories to encourage or try to influence cultural norms, perhaps? Were the people that told the authors those stories doing one or both, perhaps?
The Anglo Saxon Chronicles and Irish Annals record hundreds of years of history but they are not a running commentary, more like a teenager's journal. "In July X went here and did this.", "Y was in such and such a place on to do whatever." There is no attempt by the chroniclers to explain or give context so linking any two entries in the chronicle is a matter of interpretation.
To mix my metaphors trying to cross correlate the ASC or IAs to any of the sagas is like trying to work out the history of WW2 by reading the diary of a French solider and the memoirs of a Japanese soldier, perhaps it's not a great metaphor but I think it's suggestive of the difficulty.
To be frank, if you want to believe all the sources and have faith that they are all correct you might as well watch the HBO series Vikings (especially the first few seasons are very entertaining provided your not squeamish about blood).
Problem with this page?
Geni member
Geni member
