![](http://assets13.geni.com/images/external/twitter_bird_small.gif?1644539184)
![](http://assets11.geni.com/images/facebook_white_small_short.gif?1644539184)
I know it sounds strange, but his father is --> Joscelin I, seigneur de Courtenay {OK}
this his son is --> Joscelin I, count of Edessa (C edit display name locked from II to I)
..then the numbering continues regular (now:).
(in truth nothing strange, you will often find numbering re-starting over when the line changes place, or increases in degree:)
{[do not make me remember the numbers of the Guy of Nantes who go to Spoleto.. with the 3rd older than the 2nd >.<]}
anyway if we want to stay aligned with all the historians, Wikis, Medlands etc etc, without inventing our own personalized numbering..
just scale the locked display name of this https://www.geni.com/people/Josselin-II-de-Courtenay-1st-count-of-E... , from II to I.
all the rest of the line is fine..
[..needless to specify that it was not so quick to unravel this little detail .. while I was trying to orient myself among the primary sources to insert them^^']
yes yes i know..
I disentangled that line from the conflicts 3 years ago, that name was mine .. I know it's not wrong :D
this is a passage of perfection 3 years of experience later:
any source for Joscelin II, leads to the son... so right now i'm thinking that
name: Josselin de Courtenay, Jr (or II but on suffix just in this medieval case)
display name: Josselin I, count of Edessa (OK perfect)
yes not bad: (with display name covering the surname and title numbering:)
* Joscelin I, seigneur de Courtenay
** Joscelin I, count of Edessa
*** Joscelin II, count of Edessa
**** Joscelin III, count of Edessa, Sénéchal de Jérusalem