![](https://www.geni.com/images/external/twitter_bird_small.gif?1654012621)
![](https://www.geni.com/images/facebook_white_small_short.gif?1654012621)
I was reading an article earlier today that referred to this William and his brother Richmond as sons of Robert Terrell. This link shows this William as son of Robert Terrell and Jane Baldwin:
https://www.ancestry.co.uk/mediaui-viewer/tree/3983119/person/-1647...
And now I'm REALLY confused because I found this that shows multiple brothers named Richmond and William. The first generation shows wife as Joanne Baldwin rather than Jane. And it shows this William who married Susannah Waters as the 3rd generation, making him son of Richmond of the 2nd generation. It doesn't help at all that there are no dates given for any of them.
All the names of all the connections are there but they're sorted out different than on the other sites I've seen.
https://www.ancestry.co.uk/imageviewer/collections/49380/images/FLH...
Debbie Gambrell I gave up World a while back and so now I cannot see it... You may be able to add to the profile or there is an ap where you can do a screenshot.
Public trees and repeated names are difficult. I am visual and it helps to be able to see a record, I think
I working on it in my Ancestry tree since I can consider it a work in progress effort on there without messing anything up with the Geni connections, but I know it would help others if the connections are correct on Geni.
I don't have any problem doing screenshots but they can't be added here in the discussions. I did put a screenshot about her marriage under the Media tab.
What I hate is when various supposedly 'official' sites from historical societies, books on the genealogy, etc. don't even have exactly the same info. But then I've learned the expensive way that just because someone writes it up and publishes it doesn't mean it is error-free. That's why I no longer purchase published genealogies. I've spent $50 per book more than once only to find it had glaring errors or omissions. I know more is correct than in error, but it does make it frustrating to try to sort it out when there is obvious conflicting info published.