Here is the Charter:No 16 .22 Dec 1447- Discharge by John Bruce of Clackmannan to his eldest cousin David the Bruce of the Kennet
The charters go on to say, No 24 :1490-Instrument of Sasine in favour of David Bruce as heir to David Bruce of Wester Kennet.
Goes on to say, David Bruce 1st died between 1480-1490 and was succeeded by his son David Bruce 2nd (Kennet). Agnes Redbeugh-spouse of deceased David Bruce, David Bruce second wife was Margaret Harries.
Hi Dean, what I'm trying to say is that David Bruce 6th Baron of Clackmannan's wife is Agnes Redhach according to records that I'll load on his profile. Currently the lineage been run is incorrect as David Bruce 6th Baron of Clackmannan wives are not Janet Stirling or Margaret/Marion Herries . These lady's Married David Bruce of Wester Kennet a whole different family. Dean can you have a look into this, thank you.
Private User are you referring to this profile??
Sir David Bruce, 6th Baron of Clackmannan & Rate
if, so, his About Comments match how he is linked. What profile is the other David Bruce who you think married Agnes Redhach. can you copy/paste the link to her profile? Maybe I can figure where/when there was some mix up.
Private User you and I created this line, using the Charters:
a1 Sir John Bruce, 5th Baron of Clackmannan & Rait
x Elizabeth Stewart of Rossyth
b1 Sir David Bruce, 6th Baron of Clackmannan & Rate
x Janet Stirling, of Keirb1c1 Robert Bruce, of Rait d before November 29, 1491
x Elizabeth Lindsayb1c1d1 David Bruce of Rait (b c 1485 - about 21yrs in 1506)
xx Mariot "Marion" Herries
b1c2 Sir David Bruce, 7th Baron Of Clackmannan x Lady Janet Blackadder, Baroness of O'Lack
Sharon its wrong. The only thing that is constant is change. The problem is William Drowning Bruce is a descendant of the Bruce's/Broases of Wester Kennet/Airth!
I've never agreed to this lineage above, I sent you a email of the Chambers Encyclopedia lineage given and it doesn't run like this.
I would appreciate it if we could follow the records and correct the Bruce heritage.
Any record that does not have Robert Bruce son of King Robert is part of the agenda "Black Parliament".
Can we correct the Royal Bruce lineage?
https://accessgenealogy.com/genealogy/dodge-genealogy-colonial-ance...
Philip, you sent me the Charters as proof. I followed them. They're great primary sources. You can't be disagreeing with them now, just because they don't prove what you want them to. (I'm not sure what that is, and had presumed it was the Charter tree as that is what you sent me to fix up the line to your satisfaction. I did that.)
Regarding I would appreciate it if we could follow the records and correct the Bruce heritage. - that's exactly what I did. If you have different primary sources that contradict these, please send them.
https://accessgenealogy.com/genealogy/dodge-genealogy-colonial-ance... is not a primary source. It's not even a secondary source. You're asking for us to follow 'records'. You need to provide them if you think the Clackmannan Charters are wrong.
Sir Robert Bruce son of Robert I the Bruce, King of Scots is on the tree, and part of this line. If you think a direct link exists between you and him that you want represented on a collective world tree, the onus is on you to find the primary sources for us to input for you.
Project created for you from the sourcs: https://www.geni.com/projects/Bruce-in-the-Charters/4475537