Do what you do, the connections to the profile and the 520 that followed it, is anyway destroyed, ruined.
This is a found from Sweden 300c, http://mis.historiska.se/mis/sok/fid.asp?fid=109203 it's a king in Ranarike who depicted himself as a Roman emperor on a coin, larger picture, http://catview.historiska.se/catview/media/highres/14710 . 100 years later the Huns came to northen Europe, all along the northen roman empier frontier, they made deals with the goths, the danes and the swedes, and many other tribes that they encountered, so that they had allies when they attacked the roman empire.
Some of these deals was based on friendly marriages between the western ruler families and the rulers of the huns, this is a known concepts to avoid feuds and wars, nevertheless, many had to pay tribute along the borders, especially on the roman side.
80 years after Atillas death a large volcano eruption occured somewhere in Siberia, creating a 3 years long winter, 6 years later a second eruption of a volcano in the Indian Ocean created a 10 years winter that killed half of the mankind on earth, mostly by starvation.
This is a very dark age in the midst of the 550, and a lot of real history turned into myths, mostly surving orally, among them the stories about this catastrophe, later named Fimbulwinter, known today just as a myth, but it nevertheless happened according to modern archeolgical findings and study of sediments. When we know, do we changes the imprint that it's all just was a myth, or do we name it as a fact?
The main reason for telling this, is that ofcourse, there will be gaps in the lines from Atilla down to us, easy to spot when the persons had to either have lived for 100-150 years, or in fact, contain some missing profiles inbetween. It could have been replaced by N.N. profiles, or being displayed regarless of the lacks of reals dates.
But this chosen solution to just cut the connections, is the easy way out, but it's also at the same time just a falsification of history.