Maredudd ap Tewdos - Age order?

Started by Brian Richard Saxberg on Thursday, October 8, 2020
Problem with this page?

Participants:

Profiles Mentioned:

Related Projects:

Showing all 6 posts
10/8/2020 at 4:45 PM

Somewhere something doesn't make logical sense. Maredudd ap Tewdos has a birth year of about 745, but daughter (Ceingar) and grandson (Arthfael Hen ap Rys) estimated at 665? It seems it would make more sense to me if it was 645 to 696? Can anyone confirm?

10/8/2020 at 8:28 PM

This line is correct as to relationships — see the links in the profiles — but the dates are, actually, unknown.

Except in extremely rare instances we do not have birth dates for any medieval people. Really rare. Even royalty.

So the birth dates are always guesses, sometimes intelligent guesses with a lot of thinking about history, sometimes just guesses.

We do have seat dates, for important people. At least sometimes.

But of course not always.

So what happens is that different genealogists or amateurs or historians make different guesses, which show up in different sources, and then get copied into data bases (like the one), and because the dates often come from different sources, they often don’t make sense together.

Presumably the all looked like they made sense, separately, in their different realms.

So I can go clean it up — we have most often been using Darrell Wolcott’s dating system, as he’s working with the genealogies and the chronicles and the land documents and history, to make the Welsh tree make sense.

10/8/2020 at 8:37 PM

Steven Mitchell Ferry — what’s going on is that Wolcott has figured dates for Maredudd, and dates for Arthfael Hen, but the connection between them, Ceingar, has no Wolcott citation; the connection is given by Bartrum.

And the Wolcott studies for the two men are different ones.

Does Wolcott address Ceingar at any point?

10/9/2020 at 3:46 AM

Thank you so much for the discussion. You've explained a lot. It does make sense about dates as guesses. Thank you again!

10/9/2020 at 6:53 AM

Wolcott has not addressed her in his publications. As a daughter of Maredudd ap Tewdos she should be dated at c. 775/780. Arthfael ap Rhys is at c. 665, so she cannot be his mother. Bartrum himself, in his Glywysing and Gwent chart (https://cadair.aber.ac.uk/dspace/bitstream/handle/2160/6516/TABLES%...) shows a great deal of confusion and corrections as to whom he thinks she might be. I would suggest that he has conflated two or more women with the same, or similar names.

10/9/2020 at 9:00 AM

Probably so. Darn it. We need to disconnect and add notes. Darn it.

Showing all 6 posts

Create a free account or login to participate in this discussion