At the time of this writing, the early MacLeod tree is a difficult thing to negotiate; there are various sources giving various trees, and in order to bring order we need to discuss which sources are most important to use. (See https://www.geni.com/projects/Clan-MacLeod/39924)
Profiles concerned in this post so far: Leod, 1st Chief of Clan MacLeod
Tormod / Norman MacLeod, 2nd Chief
Torquil Og MacLeod of Lewis
I know that it can seem, when many experts disagree, that there is no way to figure out what are the most likely true lines. And sometimes that is true, but not always.
It's worth investigating and discussing.
Therefore!
I provide sources and trees for the sources I know -- if I'm missing anything of substance, please add it. Unless it is an unsourced family web tree, in which case please don't. There are other works besides these, but I'm not actually planning on living forever, so I am confining this collection to the sources that are most important for our work here.
VARYING SOURCES FOR EARLY MACLEOD TREE:
1) the very first thing most of us will come across would be unsourced family web trees, from FamilySearch, or Ancestry, or MyHeritage, or the Millenium files, or whatever. If you have a source for the MacLeod tree, look at it -- where does the information come from? If it doesn't have any sources, it is unsourced. If it does have sources, but they are family trees, it is still unsourced -- there might be sources in those family trees, but we don't know what it is. Therefore. It might as well not be there.
2) one of the very well known, and often cited, sources is Alexander MacKenzie's "History of the MacLeods," which can be found https://archive.org/details/historyofmacleod00mack/page/n6 -- published in 1889 in Inverness by A & W Mackenzie. It's not too bad a source, and it's easily available. The problems are that it is very dated scholarship, and though it often cites its sources, it doesn't always. so it is NOT the best source to use, in any vexed piece of the tree. MacKenzie gives Olaf as the father of Leod, along with Leo's brothers Guin and Leandruis. He gives Leod the sons Torquil and Tormod. If your unsourced tree follows this structure, it probably descends from MacKenzie. You can also find MacKenzie's work on the MacLeods here: http://www.yourphotocard.com/Ascanius/documents/History%20of%20the%...
3) "The MacLeods of Dunvegan," by R.C. MacLeod, published in 1927, privately, for the Clan MacLeod Society. Available here: https://archive.org/stream/macleodsofdunveg00macl/macleodsofdunveg0... MacLeod carefully cites his evidence, and looks at several theories; he concludes that Olaf was the father of Leod, and Torquil as Leod's son.
4) "The MacLeods: The History of a Clan," by I.F. Grant, published in 1959 by Faber and Faber. It's not, alas, available online. Sellar (see below) calls this work "splendid," but I can find no citations online -- not even in the Associated Clan MacLeod site, for this early genealogy. If somebody comes across this, or has the volume on the shelf, please look and let us know if she gives any theories as to the beginnings of the MacLeod clan.
5) "The MacLeods: The Genealogy of a Clan," by Alick Morrison, published in 1974, with revised edition in 1990, in Edinburgh, by the Associated Clan MacLeod Societies. This cites primary sources, and is carefully done -- the problem for our purposes is that it is not available online. However! Not surprisingly, the Associated Clan MacLeod Societies database cites it as one of the sources. So that, for instance, if you go here, and scroll down, you can find the citations to it, and citations are given on every page of the genealogy (go to the Index link to see other names): http://macleodgenealogy.com/ACMS/D0021/I1.html -- the Associated Clan MacLeods Societies website is giving Olaf as the father of Leod (though it points to the issues), with Tormod as a son, along with John, Olaus, and two unnamed daughters. Torquil is listed as a grandson, not a son, of Leod.
6) "The MacLeods of Lewis," by William Matheson, published in "Transactions of the Gaelic Society of Inverness, Vol. LI (1978-1980), Inverness, Scotland, 1981, p. 320-337. This is, unfortunately, not available on the web, but again, the Associated Clan MacLeod Societies does link to it. (See the same link in the section above.) It is Matheson who first called into question the tradition that Torquil was a son of Leod -- Morrison built on this, and argued that Torquil was the son of Tormod's son Murdoch. (Though Morrison differed greatly from Matheson on the question of whether or not Olaf was the son of Leod -- he thought so, and Matheson did not.)
7) "The Ancestry of the MacLeods Reconsidered," by W.D.H. Sellar, in "Transactions of the Gaelic Society of Inverness," Vol. LV, 1997-1998, The Gaelic Society of Inverness, 2000, pp. 233-258. A lot of the links we have at the moment on Geni to this work aren't working, because it's no longer hosted on the MacLeod site -- BUT! It is available archived, still, so far: https://web.archive.org/web/20080513072921/http://www.macleodgeneal... -- and this is the most recent, and most important, of the studies -- Sellar,, who died, alas, this last January, was Lord Lyon King of Arms -- so overlooked Scottish heraldry -- form 2008 to 2014. The article linked to here is wonderful, for setting out the issues and the evidence. Sellar gives Torquil as the son of Murdoch. He does posit a father for Leod -- not Olaf, that's right out -- but he gives it as a theory.
Now then.
I leave this for a bit, but essentially, starting from the top down, I'd like for us to get clear on what is best for the Geni site -- and how to construct it.
Thank you.