Justin Swanström: there are profiles on GENI that are not erased and there is very little evidence of existence of those people. This one profile was erased based on "majority must be right" decision. Small square box became a threat to believers of 500 year-old mythological story about a hero. Justin, please keep the copy of this our conversation as a remainder in the future. When majority will support the new evidence, when media and popular culture will approve it, maybe then you will be in comfortable position to allow it for the small square box to be restored on a family tree?
If majority was always right we would never have science, technological evolution, democracy... All advancements in our culture were invented and driven by minority. Majority follows the charismatic leaders. Myths about the past and promises of glorious future are tools of manipulating the majority. This new overwhelming evidence of one person's existence does not have a populist agenda. Just because you've read so many typical falsifications and it gave you enough reason to be skeptic and denounce this one theory as well... Still there is not enough basis for this theory to be wrong - there are no published analytical works denouncing evidence presented in that book, so far this theory is only gaining support among people who are history PhD's and experts in analytical work over documents.
I hope you will find enough tolerance to things you do not believe in, and for this one profile to be restored.
I will not continue this conversation. I have no agenda here, but it would be nice if GENI reflected in it's database genealogical evidence found in documents, despite of political, ideological and cultural taboos, and especially popular culture. I will not play games "erase over restore" or vice versa. I am in minority here and I do not have a power to change opinions of the majority. I'm leaving this decision to your conscience.