Also note that this website of http://www.geneajourney.com/harris.html has no name or email address of its owner and no date of
posting or copyright so it may be 20 years old or just yesterdays posting. It asks for information on a handful of names but does not give any location or email address to which to reply.
The Haplogroup for Robert Harris of FTDNA Harris Group 6 is R-M269 for about 45 submitters. I know his ancestry is still unproven as the 2001 lineage for him posted by J Phil Harris and hijacked by the President of the Virginia Genealogy Society who published it in one of his Pamunkey Indian books,,has now completely refuted that lineage as it merges into the I-M253 Haplo Group of both Capt Thomas Harris of Jamestown and that of Sir William Harris d1616. R and I Haplogroups can have no common male Harris ancestor within tens of thousands of years, so this Robert Harris lineages has a few links that are impossible.
Very interesting read, as I am also connected to this Harris line.
I reviewed the FTDNA Harris Project. For those interested, you can find it here.
https://www.familytreedna.com/public/harris-ydna?iframe=yresults
I see the conflict you describe.
There are two separate Haplogroups emerging and only one can be right. The unfortunate pattern I am also seeing in this group is, in the M269 group you will see most of the R-M269 listed in red. To further bypass this conflict and find who is the true Robert Harris group we need more direct Y DNA male descendants to test further with more markers. We must find common SNPs. The red listing shows this is not their confirmed final haplogroup and more testing is needed.
Quote: "managers of Robert Harris, of "The Forks",
The entire ancestry of this Robert Harris proposed by William Deyo was published by James Phil Harris in an Article he published as a Message entered on the RootsWeb Harris-VA-L Mailing List on May 1,2001. Phil has recently refuted all of this lineage of Robert Harris except that he could be the son of the William Harris of Jamestown, but all of the rest is unproven and mostly proven wrong by DNA that was not available in 2001 when he wrote the article. At that time Phil did not even accept Mary Claiborne Rice as the wife of this Robert Harris, but has changed his beliefs since then.
Sincerely,
Tom King"
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote:"I know his ancestry is still unproven as the 2001 lineage for him posted by J Phil Harris and hijacked by the President of the Virginia Genealogy Society who published it in one of his Pamunkey Indian books,,has now completely refuted that lineage as it merges into the I-M253 Haplo Group of both Capt Thomas Harris of Jamestown and that of Sir William Harris d1616."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a bold, yet, possibly true statement. As we genealogist continue to investigate and further these lines, we begin to question these peoples ideas and theories that no one has questioned or resisted before. They have established what they feel is Patawomeck Indian Tribe. Now we search to find our Pamunkey relatives and suddenly the door becomes shut in our face!
This was a similar experience I had with Bill Deyo. I first emailed the Tribe regarding my Dabney line. I received a proper email statement of his views and opinions regarding the Dabney connection to the tribe. I then added my mother to Bill Deyo's emails. My mother being very good with genealogy research, also a teacher in the LDS genealogy program. I forwarded Bill all my family trees and a 13 generation report. Most of the links I sent him were tree paths to people he had listed in his pamphlet and books. Showing my families further affiliation to the tribe.
http://patawomeckindiantribeofvirginia.org/ct-menu-item-10
I first received a strange email stating this: "My government computer has denied me access to those links. I will have to forward your e-mail to my home computer to see if I can view them there.
Bill"
I then sent him my family research to his personal email.
things became distant after I listed all the family names we were connected to, including family names listed on their tribal website?
he wrote back with a vague response: "Dear Dr. Ibrahim,
I looked over your 13 generations. I am not familiar with any other Indian links in those names. There may be some, but I am just not familiar with them. I do not see any Patawomeck connections. I do see many names of families that we have in common, however: Harris, Dabney, Overton, Waters, Holbrook, Hobart, Tripp, Anthony, Smiton, Brownell, Courtney, Chandler, Abbott, Morgan, and others.
Bill Deyo"
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This was sent from a entirely different email address?
So I have received a email from Bill coming from 3 different places.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
But earlier, he mentioned we were connected to the same Dabney line so my family last names should be the same as his?
Quote: " I am the Patawomeck Tribal Historian, I am descended from Cornelius Dabney, as well. He was first married to an English lady named, Eedith, whom some believe was the daughter of Gov. Francis Morrison. Eedith had also been previously married to a Mr. Anderson in England and had a son by him. Cornelius' first wife died while he was the personal interpreter to Cockacoeske, Queen of Pamunkey. Due to his close relationship to Cockacoeske, it would have been the reasonable thing to do on the part of the Queen to present him with a Pamunkey wife from her own family. There is no proof of that, but knowing the ways of our forebears, it would have been most likely. Cockacoeske's husband was the late Chief Totopotomoi, who died in battle in 1656. It would have been most likely that she would have chosen one of her daughters by Totopotomoi as a wife for Cornelius Dabney. We only know that Cornelius' second wife was named Susanna and that, after his death, she remarried to a Mr. Anderson. Her son, Cornelius, was my ancestor. I have heard over the years that several Dabney descendants have the tradition of Indian blood in the family, and I have seen old photographs in which the Indian facial features are very evident.
I descend from William Dabney, the son of John Dabney and Anna Harris, and the grandson of Cornelius Dabney, who was Susanna's son. William Dabney lived in Albemarle County, VA. ."
In conclusion, I was not looking for tribal enrollment to their tribe, I simply wanted confirmation of my family tree connecting to his line and names listed within their tribe website page. I was going to ask for an official letter from the tribe stating my confirmed family tree connection.
After attaching my mother and giving him my 13 generation report, he went from us being connected to the same Dabney line to your family names do not look familiar?
Quote:"I do not see any Patawomeck connections. I do see many names of families that we have in common, however: Harris, Dabney, Overton, Waters, Holbrook, Hobart, Tripp, Anthony, Smiton, Brownell, Courtney, Chandler, Abbott, Morgan, and others."
WHAT?
Your Tribal Store lists these family names:
1. A Brief Outline of Recorded History of the Patawomeck Indian Tribe. Contains some history back to 1300 A.D. through the great massacre of the tribe by the English in 1666. Patawomeck survivors and some of their descendants are discussed. Patawomeck descendants of Stafford/King George Co. represented by the families of Newton, Jett, Sullivan, Hudson, Roberson, Groves, Butler, Fines, Green, etc., are pictured in photos, some as early as the 1850s. $15.99
A larger version of this booklet, containing additional manuscripts of documentation by the current tribal historian, William L. Deyo, in regard to some of the lines of descent, is available at $24.99
2. The Monteith Family and the Potomac Indians. Royal ancestry of Thomas Monteith (1694-1747) of Scotland and Virginia and info on some of his descendants of Potomac/Patawomeck Indian blood & allied families. Some important inclusions are: (1) true ancestry of the Newtons of Stafford Co., (2) notes on Hansbrough family of Salubria & identification of Indian Pete Hansbrough, (3) identification of Indian John Redman of Loudoun Co., (4) names & distribution of some Nanzattico Indian children among certain families in 1705, (5) photos & portraits (including Scottish color portraits of the parents of Thomas Monteith), and info touching on many other Stafford & King George Co. families such as Anderson, Ashton, Axton, Bowen, Bryan(t), Butler, Cox, Curtis, Doniphan, Elkins, Finnall, Foley, Griffin/Griffith, Grigsby, Harrison, Hudson, Jones, Kenney, Meese, Martin, Owens, Quarles, Roberson, Rogers, Rowley, Waddington, Waugh, Watts, West, Williams, etc. ..$24.99
3. The Family and Ancestry of William Dabney (ca 1743-1779) of Virginia and His Two Wives, Jane Quarles and Anna Harris. A documented Virginia Dabney family with an analysis of the English connections of the families of Dabney, Harris, Overton, Waters, Peake, Herbert, Mallory, Quarles, Millett, and others. Royal ancestries of the families of Dabney, Harris, Overton, Mallory, and Quarles are given. Never before published ancestry of the English Overton family is provided, as well as the answer to the mystery of the Harris/Claiborne connection. Contains illustrations/photos (some color) of funeral monuments, portraits, churches, etc. ..$15.99
4. King George County, Virginia, 1800 Census.
Lost 1800 Census has been discovered and is now available (softbound). ..$18.95
5. Porch Family, the Forgotten Legacy of White Oak, Stafford County, Virginia. Descendants of Richard Porch (16??-1750), the Grandfather of White Oak, including families of Bates, Berry, Brown, Burton, Chinn, Cox, Curtis, Fines, Jett, Kitchen, Limerick, McGuire, Payne, Roberson, Rollow, Sullivan, etc. ...$15.99
6. The Sullivan Family of Stafford County, Virginia. The family and some of the descendants of Darby Sullivan (1722-1800) of King George/Stafford Co., containing notes on his probable parents and grandparents and important discoveries on the ancestry of his wife, Ann Fugate, daughter of Josias Fugate. Connections to the Sullivans of Spotsylvania, Orange, & Albemarle Counties, with notes on the connection of the wife of Francis Sullivan of Spotsylvania to the family of Maj. William Newton. $14.99
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regarding Tom Kings statement and the DNA conflict, we can "weed out" any lies or fake claims being made through further Y DNA found SNPs, or overlapping segments showing who is truly connected.
If there are some fakes hijacking the tribe and history, it will be put to test in the near future. More DNA testing must be done.
The Patawomeck Indian Tribe: http://patawomeckindiantribeofvirginia.org/images/template-content/...
Things that make you say ,"MMMMMMMMMM."
No offense, but, if I am looking for the true spirit of the Algonquian speaking peoples, I find comfort in tribes like, (RED LAKE NATION)
http://www.redlakenation.org/tribal-government/tribal-history-histo...
It's tribes like this that touch my soul.
Anwar
Bill Deyo interview:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7TDDhGqycI
Becky Guy interview:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4V4671pReK8
Darren Schenemann interview: My Children named me my Indian name?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Cp3EZVP7lo
So sorry, I have to pull this groups card. I am going with my heart and gut feeling.
There is something Sketchy about this group.
watch these interviews. Tribe state recognized in 2010.
There are presently 47 living male descendants from Robert Harris that have been yDNA tested by FTDNA, from Haplogroup R-M269 while there are over 188 descendants of Capt Thomas Harris and Sir William Harris that have been tested as being from cooming from Haplogroup I-M253. These numbers have been reduced from over 100 for Robert and over 250 for Thomas & Sir William since the new European Union GDPR regulations against publication of anyone's DNA, members who did not which could remove their kit number and all DNA marker values from the FTDNA listings. These are large enough groups that can accurately determine a Haplogroup for each group by their STP's which conclusively prove that anyone that has a I Haplogroup had no common ancestors with someone from an R Haplogroup within tens of thousands of years, back to pre-historic times when these haplogroups were formed in different parts of the world. The current standard for STP determination for STP's only reaches back to 500 yDNA markers or about to the 600-1000 AD year span which can only further define each of the haplogroups into further defining, i.e. from R1bi to Ribicif3g2, etc. THIS DOES NOT SAY THAT A HARRIS FROM GROUP I HAS NOT MARRIED A HARRIS FROM GROUP R, but their male Harris offspring would always carry the Haplogroup and yDNA markers of his father.
Tom I am very efficient and trained in understanding Y DNA.
I understand the complete difference between the two. What I was mentioning is that the R-M269 group needs to test further. this is why they are all listed in red. It is not their final place on the tree.
https://www.yfull.com/tree/R1b/
For example: I hold the R-M269 marker as well. but I have tested further down the tree.
I am from the U106 group, But descended from the Original R-M269 male
Harris group needs to lock in a SNP further down the tree to finalize the match.
As far as I can tell, almost the majority of Harris DNA Group 6 of Robert Harris d1701 belog to the Haplogroup R-M269 which used to be Rib1 before they started further defining the STP's so rather than cite a long string of R1 number ie RiB1C3d2f etc they just renubered them as R-Metc. I don't do this line as most of the others have problems I have researched in the past, though my many different groups merged into this Robert Harris line in NC and KY.
As far as I can tell, almost the majority of Harris DNA Group 6 of Robert Harris d1701 belog to the Haplogroup R-M269 which used to be Rib1 before they started further defining the STP's so rather than cite a long string of R1 number ie RiB1C3d2f etc they just renubered them as R-Metc. I don't do this line as most of the others have problems I have researched in the past, though my many different groups merged into this Robert Harris line in NC and KY. The red Haplogoups are for those that have only done 67 marker test. As more markers are tested, ie more stps, these R-M269 will break down into further groups or all remain the same as there is no further difference in 111 markers tested, These Haplo group numbers have not been updated this year to my knowledge as an FTDNA surmame administrator. They have spent most of the year concerting from STR Hapl;o to STP Haplo and then worrying about the EU GDPR new regulations on privacy of DNA data.