Anette Guldager Boye
Wrote "Serving it as fact is not going to happend. And that is what it is when connected as son to father."
Mike Stangel
This is the fact she dismisses.
Odinkar, –1043, Biskop, var Søn af Jarlen Toke i Vendsyssel og beslægtet med Kongeætten. http://runeberg.org/dbl/12/0379.html
Odinkar, d. . i påsken 1043, biskop. Død i Ribe, begravet i domkirken. O. var af jysk høvdingeæt og stammede fra den danske kongeslægt. Familie: Forældre: Jarl Toke.
http://denstoredanske.dk/Dansk_Biografisk_Leksikon/Kirke_og_tro/Bis...
Both links above states that Odinkar was the son of Jarl Toke, a connection Anette refuses to reestablish. According to Adam of Bremen, Odinkar's family were from Jylland, where the location Jelling are situated were Gorm the old ruled as a king, at that place in Danmark and time, there's only one king Gorm who was the father of Toke, giving him the patronymic Gormsen, and at this time there are no other known Toke Gormsen, jarl known in history from Jylland.
The only logical explanation for Odinkar's line, is that Toke was the son of Gorm and the father of Odinkar, which place the family in Jylland just as Adam of Bremen wrote.
Considering Anette's statement, - there could have been many Toke, many Gorm, and many royal families - yes, it could and it probably was, but there was only one royal family in Jylland at that time, and only one jarl Toke, so it makes no difference!
It doesn't matter how many other kings there was if the others was known for ruling in and over other parts of the area today known as Denmark, a land that was split and first conjoined between ca. 960-985 by Gorms son Harald.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jelling_stones#Runestone_of_Harald_Bl...
1. Odinkar's father Toke Gormsen, Jarl, should be reinstated.
2. A footnote can be added saying that the connection could be hard to 100% verify, but is according to the known facts plausible and seemingly correct.
3. Regardless whatever action you take, fact is fact, and just now, the line of facts are broken by another curator due to what I interpret as ill-will, because the previous error made Odinkar, was corrected by me, making the previous creator of that profile appear as extremely incompetent, this is most likely a part of a long drawn revenge from Anette's side, that's the only logical explanation I can see, where the cutting of the father is part of her feud. The question I raise, is if this is an accepted behavior from a curator and why it's allowed?