Pam Wilson (on hiatus) Private User can you take a look at this merge?
https://www.geni.com/merge/compare/334213600540011954?return=duplic...
Both sides are MPs, but it seems very reasonable to assume they're duplicates.
Pam Wilson (on hiatus) Private User can you take a look at this merge?
https://www.geni.com/merge/compare/334213600540011954?return=duplic...
Both sides are MPs, but it seems very reasonable to assume they're duplicates.
Tagging Richard de Vernon, seigneur de Reviers (the other profile) and Ingvild Alme (the original requester).
"de Vernon" this early is probably an anachronism - it was a son/descendant of Baldwin, first Earl of Devon, who was first generally known by that cognomen in England. (Sources differ as to whether he was Baldwin's son, or great-grandson (see http://patp.us/reading/exeter.aspx ), just as they differ as to whether Richard de Reviers was the son of Baldwin FitzGilbert, William de Vernon, or a Baldwin de Redvers/Reviers .) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_de_Redvers