I find the <ABOUT> section of this profile on Nixon quite slanted and watered down. It would not pass a "wikipedia" test for balanced analysis.
One example:
Compare the Watergate section of what is written here on this profile to the wikipedia section.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watergate_scandal#Money_trail
This GENI bio has sections that try to cover-up Nixon's misdeeds by eliminating studies on concepts such as [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_privilege '''executive privilege'''] that continue to haunt American constitutional government.
Also missing are the three important words: Kent State shootings. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_State_shootings '''Kent State Shootings''']
Also missing is any reference to Nixon's anti-semitism revealed in his infamous White House tapes and in other studies.
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/press_box/2010/12/n...
Is it more important to include passages of how Richard courted Pat ?
Also: I respectfully contend that the core values of RMN were not those of the Quaker faith.
My personal opinion on "About" sections is that we should simply link to Wikipedia and only add something if it has relevance for genealogy. Of course, if we have a scholar studying a particular profile, it makes sense that that scholar goes beyond Wikipedia if it does contributes to better profiling. However, if we don't tend to such profiles on a regular basis, anything that is written in these sections can quickly become outdated.